Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill creates stronger penalties and accountability measures for insurance fraud crimes.
The problem
Insurance fraud costs the system billions annually, raising premiums for honest customers and straining resources. Current enforcement mechanisms may be insufficient to deter fraud.
The proposal
The bill establishes enhanced penalties, reporting requirements, and accountability procedures for individuals and entities committing insurance fraud across health and other insurance sectors.
The impact
Insurance companies, patients, healthcare providers, and federal/state enforcement agencies face new compliance requirements and enforcement tools. Insureds may experience premium changes based on fraud reduction.
Stronger penalties deter fraudulent claims, potentially reducing billions in annual fraud costs. This could lower overall system expenses and reduce pressure on legitimate premium increases.
By cracking down on fraud, honest customers may see more stable or lower insurance premiums. Resources currently lost to fraud can be redirected to legitimate claims.
Enhanced accountability measures and reporting requirements give federal and state agencies better ability to investigate and prosecute fraud cases effectively.
Clearer standards and penalties create more consistent enforcement across states and insurers, making the insurance system more fair and predictable.
Insurance companies must invest in new reporting systems and compliance procedures. These costs may be passed to consumers through higher premiums or reduced coverage options.
Stronger penalties could lead to aggressive investigations that harm innocent people. Patients or providers may face accusations without sufficient evidence, causing stress and financial harm.
Healthcare providers and insurers face new paperwork and reporting requirements, taking resources away from patient care. Small providers may struggle more than large corporations with compliance.
Without an official summary, the specific penalties, definitions, and procedures are unknown. This creates uncertainty about actual implementation and real-world consequences.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.