Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Establishes security rules for submarine internet cables connecting the United States.
The problem
Submarine cables carry 99% of international data traffic. Foreign actors may threaten these cables through espionage, sabotage, or unauthorized access, risking national security and communications.
The proposal
Creates policies requiring security standards for submarine cables, likely including vetting procedures, monitoring systems, and regulations for cable routes and operators.
The impact
Affects cable companies, internet providers, international partners, and users relying on global data transmission. May increase costs and slow international connectivity projects.
Submarine cables are vital to U.S. national security and economic interests. Strong security policies help prevent foreign adversaries from intercepting sensitive data or damaging cables that billions of people depend on daily.
Establishes standards that make it harder for hostile nations to spy on Americans through undersea cables. This protects personal information, business secrets, and government communications from foreign surveillance.
Ensures the U.S. controls its own critical communications infrastructure. This preserves American independence in global internet governance and protects against foreign control of key networks.
Clear security requirements help cable companies plan investments with certainty. Standardized rules level the playing field for all operators and reduce confusion about compliance.
Cable companies must invest in new security systems, certifications, and monitoring equipment. These expenses may be passed to internet providers and consumers through higher fees.
Adding security reviews and approval processes delays new cable construction. Countries and companies may abandon projects, reducing global internet competition and investment.
Strict vetting of foreign companies or cable routes may tension U.S. relations with allied nations. Other countries might retaliate with their own restrictions on American companies.
Companies must navigate new regulations and approval systems, requiring lawyers and compliance staff. Smaller operators may struggle more than large corporations with these requirements.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10671
Securing Our Critical Infrastructure Act
S 5668
Methane Monitoring Science Act of 2026
HR 7022
Mystic Alerts Act
S 5541
Cybersecurity and AI Board of Investigations Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.