Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates a new board to investigate cybersecurity and artificial intelligence issues.
The problem
Cybersecurity threats and AI development pose growing national security and public safety challenges. Current oversight may be fragmented across agencies.
The proposal
Establishes a Cybersecurity and AI Board of Investigations to coordinate investigations and oversight of cybersecurity threats and artificial intelligence matters.
The impact
Federal agencies, technology companies, AI developers, and cybersecurity professionals will report to and work with this new oversight board.
A dedicated board could reduce confusion and gaps between different agencies handling cybersecurity and AI issues. This coordination might make investigations more efficient and effective.
Having one board focused on these emerging threats could help protect critical infrastructure and government systems. This targeted approach addresses growing cyber and AI risks.
A unified board might respond quicker to emerging threats instead of waiting for multiple agencies to coordinate. Faster action could prevent or limit damage from cyberattacks.
Creating a new federal board adds another layer of government and increases spending. This could slow down decision-making rather than speed it up.
The FBI, NSA, and other agencies already handle cybersecurity investigations. A new board might duplicate their work and create confusion about who is in charge.
The bill provides minimal details about the board's actual authority and how it will operate. This vagueness could lead to conflicts or ineffectiveness.
Tech companies and AI developers may face more reporting requirements and oversight. This could increase compliance costs and slow innovation.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10671
Securing Our Critical Infrastructure Act
HR 10695
United States Submarine Cable Security Policy Act of 2026
HR 7022
Mystic Alerts Act
S 5668
Methane Monitoring Science Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.