Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Clarifies how rural schools and communities receive federal funding from forest revenue sharing.
The problem
Existing rural school funding tied to forest revenues needs clarification on eligibility, distribution methods, and program continuation to ensure stable funding for affected communities.
The proposal
The bill clarifies provisions of the Secure Rural Schools program regarding how federal forest revenues are allocated to rural schools and community projects in timber-dependent areas.
The impact
Rural school districts and communities dependent on federal forest revenue sharing would receive clearer guidelines for accessing and using these funds for education and local projects.
Clarifying the program removes uncertainty about funding availability. Rural schools in timber-dependent areas can better plan budgets and programs when rules are clear and predictable.
Clearer guidelines help rural communities dependent on forest revenues plan economic development and services. This reduces financial uncertainty for small towns and counties.
Clarifying existing program rules can reduce confusion and paperwork. Communities spend less time seeking guidance and more time delivering services.
Clarification might codify lower funding levels or restrict eligible uses. This could reduce total resources available to rural schools compared to previous interpretations.
The bill focuses on revenue clarification rather than addressing underlying forest management or conservation issues. It may not solve root causes of funding instability.
Clarifying rules might change which communities qualify for funding. Some communities could lose access if new definitions exclude them.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1622
Expressing support for the preservation, protection, and maintenance of statues and monuments honoring Christopher Columbus as an enduring testament to the Nation's history, heritage, and identity.
HR 10669
LANDs Act
SRES 935
A resolution designating October 23, 2026, as "National Marine Sanctuary Day".
S 5608
Secure Rural Schools Reauthorization Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.