Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Reauthorizes federal payment programs for schools and counties dependent on timber sales from public forests.
The problem
Schools and counties in rural areas historically relied on timber revenue from federal forests. Without reauthorization, these payments expire, threatening funding for local schools and public services.
The proposal
The bill extends federal payments to counties and schools based on timber harvest revenues from national forests, maintaining existing funding mechanisms for affected rural communities.
The impact
Rural school districts and county governments receive continued federal payments. Urban areas unaffected. Timber operations and environmental advocates may experience different policy outcomes.
Rural schools maintain predictable budget sources for operations and services. Students in timber-dependent regions keep educational resources stable. Communities can plan long-term infrastructure needs.
Counties maintain road maintenance, emergency services, and public infrastructure. Rural communities avoid sudden budget crises from payment loss. Local officials can continue essential operations.
Forestry-related jobs and industries remain viable in rural areas. Communities dependent on timber harvests avoid economic disruption. Regional economic activity continues at current levels.
Maintains current payment formulas and distribution methods communities rely on. Avoids administrative disruption from creating new funding systems. Preserves predictable revenue streams.
Continued timber harvests may increase forest logging and habitat loss. Ecosystem impacts from sustained harvesting pressure on public lands. Long-term forest health effects unclear.
Extends ongoing federal spending obligations without new revenue sources. May increase deficit spending if not offset by other funds. Long-term fiscal sustainability questioned.
Locks in existing payment formulas that may not reflect current needs. Prevents reallocation of resources to other rural priorities. Creates inflexible long-term commitments.
Urban and non-timber-dependent rural areas receive different federal support levels. Benefits concentrated in specific regions with forest access. Unequal distribution of public resource benefits.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1622
Expressing support for the preservation, protection, and maintenance of statues and monuments honoring Christopher Columbus as an enduring testament to the Nation's history, heritage, and identity.
HR 10669
LANDs Act
SRES 935
A resolution designating October 23, 2026, as "National Marine Sanctuary Day".
HR 6380
Chiricahua National Park Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.