Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill to support biological science research and education in the United States.
The problem
The U.S. may need stronger support for biology research, education, and workforce development to remain competitive globally and address scientific challenges.
The proposal
Establishes programs to advance biology research, education, and training. Creates funding mechanisms for scientific initiatives in biological fields and related areas.
The impact
Affects scientists, students, research institutions, and companies in biology fields. May influence federal funding for science education and research programs.
Increased funding for biology research could lead to medical breakthroughs, new treatments, and scientific discoveries. Universities and research labs would have more resources to pursue important studies.
Supporting biology education helps prepare students for science careers. Better-trained scientists benefit industries and address future workforce needs in healthcare and biotech.
Investment in biological sciences can spur innovation and create high-paying jobs in biotech, pharmaceuticals, and related industries. Growing these sectors strengthens the economy.
Biology research is essential for developing new medicines and treatments. Funding could accelerate solutions to diseases and public health problems.
The bill likely requires significant federal spending. This adds to the national budget and may compete with funding for other priorities like infrastructure or defense.
Without details on how money is allocated or distributed, it's hard to know if funds will be used efficiently. Some initiatives might not produce promised results.
Large research institutions may benefit more than small colleges or schools in rural areas. Not all communities or students may access the programs equally.
Results from research take years to materialize. Government funding also depends on future budgets, creating uncertainty for long-term projects and commitments.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10671
Securing Our Critical Infrastructure Act
HR 10695
United States Submarine Cable Security Policy Act of 2026
HR 7022
Mystic Alerts Act
S 5668
Methane Monitoring Science Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.