Latest action: Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 29 - 0.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Speaker of the House schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Bill establishes a framework for artificial intelligence research and development coordination.
The problem
The US lacks unified guidance on AI development. Different agencies handle AI differently. This creates confusion about standards and oversight for AI research.
The proposal
Creates structure for federal AI research coordination. Establishes guidelines for AI development. Sets up communication between government agencies working on AI issues.
The impact
Affects AI researchers, tech companies, federal agencies, and organizations using AI. May clarify rules for AI development and help coordinate government AI efforts.
Gives researchers and companies better guidance on what's allowed. Reduces confusion about different agency requirements. Helps everyone understand AI standards.
Stops agencies from working separately on the same problems. Saves money by avoiding duplicate efforts. Creates consistent approaches across government.
Coordinated research helps US keep pace with other countries on AI. Strengthens the American tech industry. Encourages innovation in a growing field.
Framework can include safety standards for AI systems. Helps identify problems before they spread. Protects public interests as AI grows.
New coordination structure adds federal oversight. Creates more paperwork and processes. Small companies might struggle with new requirements.
Bill summary unavailable so exact requirements unknown. Different interpretations possible. Rules might change as agencies implement them.
More regulations might make research slower. Companies need time to follow new procedures. Risk of delaying beneficial AI applications.
Government choices about AI standards might favor certain groups. Could disadvantage smaller researchers or companies. Standards might reflect political views rather than science.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10671
Securing Our Critical Infrastructure Act
HR 10695
United States Submarine Cable Security Policy Act of 2026
HR 7022
Mystic Alerts Act
S 5668
Methane Monitoring Science Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.