Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill aims to use counseling instead of criminal charges for certain school discipline issues.
The problem
Students face criminal charges for school behavioral problems that might be better addressed through counseling and support services rather than the criminal justice system.
The proposal
Directs schools to prioritize counseling and mental health services over criminal prosecution for eligible student infractions and behavioral issues.
The impact
Students, schools, and law enforcement affected by changes in how school discipline cases are handled and whether they enter the criminal system.
Students avoid permanent criminal records for school incidents, improving future job and college prospects. Early intervention through counseling may prevent deeper involvement in the criminal justice system.
Counseling can identify underlying issues like trauma, mental illness, or home problems causing behavior. Treatment addresses problems rather than just punishing symptoms.
Police and courts spend less time on school discipline cases. Resources can focus on serious crimes affecting public safety.
Students receiving counseling support may have better school attendance and academic performance. Supportive approach could reduce dropout rates.
Some argue diverting serious incidents from criminal justice weakens school safety measures. Removing law enforcement involvement could leave schools unprepared for dangerous situations.
Many schools lack sufficient counselors and mental health staff to handle more cases. New mandates could strain budgets without funding increases.
Students harmed by others' behavior might feel criminal prosecution better addresses wrongdoing. Counseling-only approach could seem lenient to victims.
Bill lacks specifics on which infractions qualify, how decisions are made, and what happens if counseling fails. Vague language could create inconsistent application.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.