Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Originating chamber has voted to pass. Sent to the other chamber.
The House voted to pass the bill. It now moves to the Senate, which repeats the committee referral and floor-vote process.
Next: Passed Both Chambers
Conference committee (if versions differ), then the President
Bill promotes teaching reading using science-based methods in schools.
The problem
Many schools use reading instruction methods not supported by scientific research, potentially hindering student literacy development and achievement.
The proposal
Requires schools to adopt reading instruction practices based on scientific evidence about how children learn to read most effectively.
The impact
Teachers, students, and schools must change reading instruction methods. Students may benefit from improved literacy skills. Schools need new training and resources.
Science-based reading methods have proven effective in research studies. Students may learn to read faster and understand texts better. This could close literacy gaps and improve academic success.
Standardizing reading instruction across schools ensures all students get quality teaching. Teachers follow methods proven to work. This reduces differences between strong and weak schools.
Strong reading skills in early grades lead to better performance in other subjects. Students are more likely to graduate and succeed later in life.
Clear guidelines help teachers know what methods work best. Teachers can feel more confident in their instruction and see better results with students.
Schools must spend money to train teachers in new methods. Districts with tight budgets may struggle to afford this training and new materials.
Teachers have less choice in how to teach reading. Some educators believe they should decide their own methods based on their students' needs.
Schools vary widely in resources and student needs. A one-size-fits-all approach may not work for every classroom or community.
Switching to new methods takes time and disrupts current instruction. Some schools may struggle to change quickly while maintaining quality.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.