Latest action: Committee on Indian Affairs. Hearings held.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Clarifies legal jurisdiction and authority for the Shivwits Band of Paiutes tribe.
The problem
Ambiguity exists regarding which government—tribal, state, or federal—holds jurisdiction over Shivwits Band lands and members, creating legal uncertainty.
The proposal
Establishes clear jurisdictional boundaries defining tribal sovereignty and government authority over Shivwits Band territory and enrolled members.
The impact
Shivwits Band members, tribal government, Utah state officials, and federal agencies gain clarity on legal authority and regulatory oversight.
Clarifying jurisdiction strengthens tribal self-determination by establishing clear authority for the Shivwits Band to govern its own affairs. This allows the tribe to manage resources, enforce laws, and make decisions affecting their community more effectively.
Clear jurisdictional boundaries reduce legal disputes between tribal, state, and federal authorities. This creates predictability for businesses, residents, and government agencies operating in the area.
Defined jurisdiction can facilitate tribal economic initiatives by removing regulatory confusion. Investors and businesses may have greater confidence operating under clear legal frameworks.
Explicit jurisdictional clarity helps prevent conflicts between the tribe and state/federal governments. This reduces costly litigation and administrative confusion.
Utah state officials may view jurisdictional expansion as reducing state regulatory power over reservation lands. This could create tension between tribal and state governance interests.
Establishing new jurisdictional frameworks may require administrative resources and legal adjustments. Both tribal and federal governments may face costs implementing the changes.
Clarifying jurisdiction creates obligations for enforcement and administration that the tribe must fulfill. The Shivwits Band may need additional capacity, funding, and institutional development.
The bill may conflict with previous agreements or compacts between the tribe, state, and federal government. Resolving these conflicts could delay implementation.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.