Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires notifying parents when minors travel across state lines for abortion.
The problem
Some states restrict abortion while others permit it. Minors may travel between states to access abortion services without parental knowledge or consent.
The proposal
This bill would require notification of at least one parent or guardian when a minor travels interstate to obtain an abortion procedure.
The impact
Minors seeking abortion across state lines, parents, healthcare providers, and state abortion laws would be affected by new notification requirements.
Parents could be informed about major medical decisions affecting their minor children. This aligns with existing parental notification laws in many states.
Creates uniform notification standards when minors cross state borders. Reduces inconsistencies in how different states handle minor abortion access.
Family awareness of medical procedures may facilitate better follow-up care and identify complications. Ensures proper medical supervision and post-care support.
Restricts minors' ability to make private medical decisions independently. May discourage some minors from seeking necessary healthcare.
Minors in abusive or unsafe home situations may face harm if parents are notified. Could endanger vulnerable youth seeking to escape difficult circumstances.
Notification requirements may delay access to time-sensitive medical care. Could create obstacles for minors seeking urgent abortion services.
May conflict with interstate travel rights and medical privacy protections. Could face constitutional challenges regarding freedom of movement.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.