Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S1057)
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates a database to track corporations convicted of crimes.
The problem
Corporations sometimes commit crimes like fraud or pollution. There is no central system tracking which companies have been convicted. This makes it hard for government and public to know corporate criminal history.
The proposal
Establishes a federal database recording corporations that are criminally convicted. Lists the crimes, dates, penalties, and company details. Makes this information accessible to agencies and potentially the public.
The impact
Corporations face increased transparency about criminal convictions. Government agencies can access criminal history when making decisions. The public could learn about companies' legal violations and safety records.
People could look up whether companies they do business with have criminal records. Consumers could make informed choices about which companies to support. Transparency helps the market work better.
Federal agencies could check corporate criminal history before awarding contracts. Reduces chance government funds go to companies with serious violations. Makes government spending safer and more responsible.
Creates one official record of corporate crimes instead of scattered court documents. Makes it easier to identify repeat offenders. Supports efforts to hold companies accountable for illegal behavior.
Public database may discourage companies from breaking the law if convictions are visible. Reputation damage could motivate better corporate behavior. Makes consequences for crimes more obvious and lasting.
Public database could permanently damage company reputation even after penalties are served. Companies might struggle to recover or rebrand after mistakes. Could be unfair if mistakes are listed forever without context.
Creating and maintaining a national database requires staff, technology, and ongoing funding. Different courts report data differently, making it hard to standardize. Could be expensive with unclear long-term budget needs.
Competitors might use database to unfairly target each other's businesses. Information could be misinterpreted or taken out of context. No clear rules about who accesses data or how it's used.
Database only shows convictions, not settled cases or investigations. Companies convicted of minor crimes treated same as those with major ones. Doesn't show rehabilitation efforts or changed practices after conviction.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.