Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Improves mental health support and services for Latino youth.
The problem
Latino youth face mental health challenges but may lack access to culturally appropriate services, resources, or awareness about available help.
The proposal
The bill would establish programs, funding, and initiatives to expand mental health services tailored to Latino youth communities.
The impact
Latino youth and their families would gain better access to mental health care. Healthcare providers and community organizations would receive support to offer these services.
Latino youth face higher rates of depression and suicide. Culturally relevant mental health services can meet their specific needs better. This could improve outcomes and save lives.
Funding for local programs strengthens mental health infrastructure in Latino communities. Schools, clinics, and nonprofits gain tools to help young people. This creates lasting support systems.
Educational initiatives help Latino families understand mental health and reduce stigma. Young people learn to recognize problems and seek help. Prevention becomes easier.
Healthier youth do better in school and work. Better mental health leads to higher graduation rates and productivity. Communities benefit economically long-term.
The bill details are not yet available. It's unknown whether this requires new federal spending or uses existing budgets. Costs to taxpayers remain uncertain.
Finding trained mental health providers in underserved areas is difficult. Rapid program expansion could face delays or quality issues. Success depends on execution.
Other federal and state programs already address Latino youth mental health. New initiatives might overlap with existing services instead of filling real gaps.
No official summary exists yet, so specific program design is unknown. Evaluating effectiveness or fairness is difficult without full information.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.