Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires government agencies to disclose details about surveillance programs to the public.
The problem
Citizens lack information about how government agencies conduct surveillance. This secrecy makes it hard for people to understand or challenge surveillance activities.
The proposal
The bill would require government agencies to publicly report information about their surveillance programs, including methods used and number of people affected.
The impact
Government agencies must release surveillance data. Citizens gain access to information about government monitoring. Privacy advocates and law enforcement are both affected differently.
Citizens can see how government agencies conduct surveillance. This transparency helps people understand if their privacy is being protected. It allows voters to make informed decisions about government policies.
Public disclosure can prevent abuse of surveillance authority. When agencies know their actions will be disclosed, they may use surveillance more carefully. Congress and courts can better review surveillance practices.
Transparency enables meaningful public debate about surveillance. Citizens and civil rights groups can advocate for policy changes based on facts. Democracy works better when people understand government actions.
Public disclosure helps courts understand surveillance scope and scale. This information supports legal challenges to potentially unlawful programs. Clear disclosure requirements establish consistent standards across agencies.
Disclosing surveillance methods could help criminals and terrorists avoid detection. Revealing specific techniques might compromise ongoing investigations. Enemies could learn about U.S. intelligence capabilities and adapt their behavior.
Public disclosure might tip off suspects about surveillance. Criminal networks could change tactics if they know detection methods. Law enforcement effectiveness could decrease with mandatory transparency.
Disclosing surveillance data could reveal information about innocent people. Publishing statistics or methods might indirectly expose targets of investigations. Balancing transparency with individual privacy becomes difficult.
Agencies must spend resources creating and releasing reports instead of conducting investigations. Compliance costs could strain law enforcement budgets. Smaller agencies might struggle with reporting requirements.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.