Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Allows people with concealed carry permits to use them across all states.
The problem
Currently, concealed carry gun permits are state-specific. Someone with a permit in one state may not be able to carry in another state, creating inconsistency.
The proposal
The bill would recognize concealed carry permits from any state as valid in all other states, creating a national reciprocity standard for permit holders.
The impact
Gun owners, law enforcement, and state governments would be affected. Gun owners gain mobility; states lose control over their own gun policies.
People who rely on concealed carry for self-defense could maintain that protection across state lines.
People with permits could travel between states without worrying about breaking laws. This removes legal confusion for citizens who move or travel frequently.
Supporters argue this treats gun ownership rights like driver's licenses, which work nationwide. This could provide uniform constitutional protection across the country.
Gun owners would not need multiple permits for different states. This simplifies the licensing process and reduces administrative costs.
States have traditionally set their own gun regulations. This bill removes state authority to decide permit standards, training, and background checks within their borders.
States have varying permit requirements, training hours, and background check standards. National reciprocity could allow people with minimal training to carry in stricter states.
Critics worry that people from states with weak permit requirements could carry in cities with stricter gun policies. This could complicate local law enforcement efforts.
States cannot verify whether someone from another state received adequate training or background screening. This limits states' ability to protect their residents.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.