Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill proposes restrictions on a specific former president's eligibility or powers.
The problem
Proponents believe certain former presidential actions or potential future actions warrant legislative restrictions or preventive measures.
The proposal
The bill text is unavailable. Unable to determine specific legislative changes without official bill language.
The impact
Without bill text, impact scope cannot be determined. Potential effects could range from electoral, constitutional, or governmental depending on provisions.
Supporters may argue the bill creates safeguards against policies they view as harmful. Proponents could contend it protects democratic institutions.
The bill could establish clear legal standards around executive authority. This might reduce ambiguity in constitutional interpretation.
Supporters may view this as establishing consequences for past actions. It could represent a mechanism for accountability.
Critics argue such bills may conflict with constitutional protections and separation of powers. Courts could strike down provisions as unconstitutional.
Opponents contend targeting specific individuals sets dangerous precedent for future partisan legislation. This could weaponize the legislative process.
Implementation and enforcement of restrictions on individuals may face legal obstacles. Defining and enforcing provisions could prove difficult.
Critics argue such bills restrict voter choice in elections. This could limit democratic participation and electoral freedom.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.