Latest action: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S5295)
Originating chamber has voted to pass. Sent to the other chamber.
The House voted to pass the bill. It now moves to the Senate, which repeats the committee referral and floor-vote process.
Next: Passed Both Chambers
Conference committee (if versions differ), then the President
Allows federal contractors to hire workers based on skills rather than requiring specific degrees.
The problem
Federal contracting rules may require unnecessary college degrees for jobs where skills matter more. This limits hiring pools and increases labor costs for government projects.
The proposal
Changes federal contracting rules to prioritize demonstrated skills and competencies over formal education requirements when selecting workers on government contracts.
The impact
Federal contractors, job seekers without degrees, and government agencies. Affects hiring practices for millions of federal contract positions across industries.
People with practical skills but no college degree could apply for federal contract jobs. This opens career paths for vocational training graduates and experienced workers.
Companies can hire qualified workers at lower wages if degree requirements are removed. This could reduce costs on federal projects and free up budget for other needs.
Federal contractors struggle to find workers. Allowing skills-based hiring expands the available workforce and speeds up project completion.
Hiring based on what someone can do rather than credentials they hold is more practical. Workers prove they can do the job through demonstrated skills.
Degree requirements ensure workers meet baseline training and knowledge. Removing them could lead to workers lacking important background knowledge needed for complex work.
Federal contractors may struggle to understand new hiring standards. Different interpretations of 'skills-based' could lead to inconsistent practices and legal disputes.
Workers who spent time and money on degrees might lose competitive advantage. This could discourage education investment and create unfair hiring bias.
Testing and assessing skills consistently across different jobs and contractors is difficult. Bad assessment methods could let unqualified workers get hired.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
HR 6006
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 401 North Elm Street in Tuskegee, Alabama, as the "Tuskegee Airmen Memorial Post Office".
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.