Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Originating chamber has voted to pass. Sent to the other chamber.
The House voted to pass the bill. It now moves to the Senate, which repeats the committee referral and floor-vote process.
Next: Passed Both Chambers
Conference committee (if versions differ), then the President
Rename a post office in Tuskegee, Alabama after the Tuskegee Airmen.
The problem
The post office at 401 North Elm Street in Tuskegee lacks a name honoring the historic Tuskegee Airmen, African American pilots who served in World War II.
The proposal
Change the official name of the postal facility to the Tuskegee Airmen Memorial Post Office to honor these veterans.
The impact
Postal customers and residents of Tuskegee gain a facility name reflecting local history. The Tuskegee Airmen legacy receives official recognition through federal naming.
Names the facility after pioneering African American military heroes. Provides permanent tribute to the Tuskegee Airmen's contributions to American history and breaking racial barriers in the military.
Gives Tuskegee residents a facility name reflecting their town's significant historical legacy. Strengthens community identity and connection to these important veterans.
Renaming requires minimal resources. Only involves updating signage and official postal records without budget impact.
The memorial name serves as a teaching point about the Tuskegee Airmen. Helps educate citizens visiting or using the postal facility about this important history.
Postal Service must update address databases, signage, and official records. Creates minor operational adjustments for staff and customers.
Renaming does not provide direct benefits to Tuskegee Airmen veterans or their families. Is primarily symbolic rather than substantive assistance.
Funds and legislative time spent on naming could address other community needs. Questions whether this represents the best use of congressional focus.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.