Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Reauthorizes federal Community Oriented Policing Services grants and programs for law enforcement.
The problem
COPS program funding and authorization expire. Law enforcement agencies need continued federal grants for hiring, training, and community policing initiatives.
The proposal
Extends COPS program authorization and funding. Allows federal grants to police departments for officer hiring, equipment, technology, and community engagement programs.
The impact
Police departments receive federal funding for staffing and programs. Communities access policing services. Taxpayers fund program expenses through federal budget.
Provides federal grants to help cities and towns hire police officers. This can increase police presence in communities and help departments maintain staffing levels.
COPS grants support community-oriented policing and youth programs. These initiatives aim to build relationships between police and neighborhoods.
Grants help departments purchase technology and equipment like body cameras and dispatch systems. This can improve police efficiency and accountability.
Can require training on de-escalation, implicit bias, and mental health response. Better training may improve officer performance and community safety.
Reauthorization requires federal spending on grant programs. This adds to the national budget deficit unless offset by other spending cuts or revenue.
Federal grants come with requirements and restrictions on how money is spent. Local departments may have less flexibility in addressing community needs.
Critics argue grants focus on hiring and equipment rather than accountability reforms or addressing systemic issues some communities want addressed.
Without clear oversight requirements, it's unclear if programs will include sufficient performance standards or community accountability mechanisms.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.