Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Protects the Great Lakes from certain federal regulations or actions.
The problem
The bill responds to concerns about federal government control over Great Lakes policies and management decisions affecting the region.
The proposal
The bill limits federal authority over Great Lakes management, likely preventing certain federal actions or regulations without state approval.
The impact
States bordering the Great Lakes, environmental groups, and federal agencies gain or lose decision-making power over water resources.
Gives states and communities more say in managing their own water resources. States can make decisions based on regional needs rather than national rules.
Reduces bureaucracy by cutting federal approval steps. Local governments may act quicker on water management issues affecting their region.
Allows states to tailor policies to local conditions and priorities. Different regions can address unique environmental or economic challenges differently.
Federal rules often set minimum environmental protections across states. Removing federal oversight could allow some states to weaken pollution controls or water quality standards.
Great Lakes cross state borders, so one state's decisions affect others. Without federal coordination, states might fight over water use and pollution.
Different states might adopt different rules, creating confusion for businesses and uneven environmental protection. Some areas could have much weaker safeguards than others.
Federal agencies provide funding and technical expertise for water management. States may lack resources to manage the Great Lakes alone.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1622
Expressing support for the preservation, protection, and maintenance of statues and monuments honoring Christopher Columbus as an enduring testament to the Nation's history, heritage, and identity.
HR 10669
LANDs Act
SRES 935
A resolution designating October 23, 2026, as "National Marine Sanctuary Day".
S 5608
Secure Rural Schools Reauthorization Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.