Latest action: Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Gary Peters (D-MI)
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
This bill establishes cybersecurity standards for satellites used by the United States.
The problem
Satellites are critical infrastructure but face increasing cyber threats. The U.S. needs consistent security requirements to protect these systems from attacks.
The proposal
The bill sets mandatory cybersecurity standards and requirements that satellite operators must follow to reduce vulnerability to hacking and cyber attacks.
The impact
Satellite companies, government agencies, and communication providers must adopt new security practices. Costs may increase, but national security and infrastructure resilience improve.
Stronger cybersecurity standards help prevent attacks on satellites that support communications, GPS, weather forecasting, and military operations. This protects essential services Americans depend on daily.
Uniform standards make it harder for foreign adversaries to exploit satellite systems. This strengthens U.S. defenses in space and cyber domains.
Clear requirements help satellite companies know what security measures to implement. This creates a level playing field for the industry.
Mandatory cybersecurity rules prevent problems before they happen. This is more effective than responding after satellites are compromised.
Satellite companies must invest in new security technology and personnel. These costs may be passed to consumers through higher service prices.
Compliance requirements create paperwork and administrative work for companies. Smaller satellite businesses may struggle more than large corporations.
Strict regulations might discourage companies from developing new satellite technology. Lengthy approval processes could delay beneficial innovations.
U.S. satellite companies face costs that foreign competitors may not. This could disadvantage American companies in the global market.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10671
Securing Our Critical Infrastructure Act
HR 10695
United States Submarine Cable Security Policy Act of 2026
HR 7022
Mystic Alerts Act
S 5668
Methane Monitoring Science Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.