Latest action: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Chrissy Houlahan (D-PA)
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Gives Public Health Service officers the same leave benefits as Army officers.
The problem
Public Health Service commissioned officers may not have the same leave privileges as military officers in the Army, creating potential inequity in benefits and working conditions.
The proposal
Amends Public Health Service law to give commissioned officers the same leave rights and benefits that Army commissioned officers receive under federal law.
The impact
Public Health Service officers and their families would gain access to additional leave benefits, potentially affecting budget requirements and leave administration.
Public Health Service officers would receive the same leave benefits as Army officers, creating fairness across federal health services. This recognizes that both groups serve important government functions.
Better leave benefits may help the Public Health Service attract and keep qualified officers. This could improve the agency's ability to respond to health emergencies and crises.
Aligning Public Health Service benefits with Army benefits creates consistency across federal agencies. This reduces confusion and treats similar government workers fairly.
Providing additional leave benefits costs money through increased payroll and administrative expenses. The bill does not specify how these costs would be paid.
The Public Health Service would need to update leave policies, train staff, and adjust systems. This requires time and resources to implement correctly.
The bill's specific leave provisions are vague, making it unclear what exact benefits officers would receive. This could create confusion during implementation.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.