Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Reauthorizes the Build to Scale program supporting technology and innovation infrastructure development.
The problem
Technology infrastructure and innovation initiatives require ongoing funding and authorization to maintain momentum and support American competitiveness in science and technology sectors.
The proposal
The bill reauthorizes the Build to Scale program, which funds technology development and infrastructure projects. It likely extends program authority and potentially adjusts funding levels.
The impact
Technology companies, research institutions, and communities receiving infrastructure investments are affected. Federal budget allocation to tech initiatives is impacted.
Continued funding helps American companies develop new technologies and stay competitive globally. This can create jobs in tech sectors and support economic growth.
Reauthorization maintains support for research institutions and universities working on technology projects. This supports scientific advancement and education in STEM fields.
Funding technology infrastructure in communities improves broadband access and digital capabilities. This helps rural and underserved areas participate in the tech economy.
Investment in technology infrastructure helps the U.S. compete with other nations in innovation. This supports long-term economic strength.
Reauthorizing programs adds federal spending during budget constraints. Policymakers may debate whether funds should go elsewhere or reduce deficits.
Without an official summary, it is unclear how funds are allocated or what specific outcomes are expected. Oversight and accountability details are unknown.
Tech infrastructure funding may benefit certain regions or companies more than others. Rural areas or less-developed tech hubs might receive unequal support.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10671
Securing Our Critical Infrastructure Act
HR 10695
United States Submarine Cable Security Policy Act of 2026
HR 7022
Mystic Alerts Act
S 5668
Methane Monitoring Science Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.