Latest action: Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Prevents presidents from receiving payments or benefits after being pardoned for crimes.
The problem
Concern that pardoned individuals, including former presidents, could profit from or receive benefits related to their crimes or convictions.
The proposal
Establishes restrictions on financial payments and benefits for any person pardoned by a president, potentially including former presidents themselves.
The impact
Affects pardoned individuals by limiting financial gains. Impacts presidential pardon authority and how pardons are used.
The bill aims to stop pardoned people from making money off their crimes through book deals, speaking fees, or other commercial ventures. This could discourage criminal behavior and eliminate financial incentives to seek pardons. It reinforces the idea that crimes should not lead to financial gain.
By restricting benefits for pardoned individuals, the bill may reinforce the principle that pardons are acts of mercy, not financial rewards. This could restore public confidence in the fairness of the pardon system and prevent abuse of presidential power.
Prevents government benefits or payments from going to pardoned criminals. This could save taxpayer money and ensure resources go to other priorities instead.
The bill restricts how presidents can use pardons by adding financial consequences. This reduces presidential authority and could make pardons less effective as a tool for justice or mercy in cases where they might be appropriate.
The bill's vague language about what payments are restricted could create confusion and legal challenges. It might unintentionally block regular income, inheritance, or other legitimate financial activity unrelated to crimes.
Monitoring and enforcing financial restrictions on pardoned individuals could be complicated and expensive. It may require government agencies to track income and spending, raising privacy concerns and enforcement costs.
People motivated by avoiding prison may still seek pardons even without receiving financial benefits. The bill assumes financial gain is the main motivation, which may not be accurate in all cases.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.