Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Coordinates wildlife health and disease prevention efforts to reduce zoonotic disease spread.
The problem
Wildlife diseases that jump to humans (zoonotic diseases) pose growing public health risks. Current coordination between wildlife and health agencies is fragmented and insufficient.
The proposal
Establishes coordination mechanisms between federal wildlife and health agencies to monitor, prevent, and respond to diseases spreading from animals to people.
The impact
Federal agencies, state wildlife officials, veterinarians, and public health workers gain better tools to track and stop animal diseases. Communities benefit from improved disease prevention.
Better coordination helps catch animal diseases before they spread to humans. This can prevent major public health crises like pandemics. Early detection saves lives and money.
Different government agencies often work separately. This bill brings wildlife experts and health experts together. Better communication means faster responses to problems.
Monitoring animal health helps protect wildlife populations from disease. Healthier wildlife benefits ecosystems and nature. This supports conservation efforts.
Preventing disease outbreaks costs far less than treating them. Early action avoids expensive emergency responses. Communities save resources.
New coordination efforts and monitoring programs require funding. This means taxpayers may pay more. Budget constraints could limit other programs.
The bill title suggests wildlife coordination but specific plans are unclear. Without knowing exact requirements, costs and effectiveness cannot be predicted. Agencies may struggle implementing unclear rules.
It is unknown which diseases are covered or which agencies must participate. Limited information makes it hard to evaluate whether this goes too far or not far enough.
State wildlife agencies and private landowners might face new requirements. Small states with limited budgets could struggle meeting coordination demands.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.