Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill provides emergency funding for Texas flood relief and recovery efforts.
The problem
Texas experienced significant flooding that caused damage to communities, infrastructure, and private property requiring federal emergency assistance.
The proposal
Allocates supplemental federal appropriations specifically for Texas flood emergency response, recovery, and rebuilding efforts through government agencies.
The impact
Flood-affected Texas residents, communities, and businesses receive federal aid for recovery. Taxpayers fund emergency spending. State and local governments coordinate relief.
Emergency supplemental funding allows rapid response to help affected residents and communities. Quick money can prevent further damage and help people recover faster.
Federal funds help rebuild damaged homes, businesses, and infrastructure. This creates jobs for construction and recovery workers in affected areas.
Federal assistance reduces the financial burden on flood victims who may lack insurance or savings. Helps families and small businesses get back on their feet.
Rebuilding damaged infrastructure can create opportunities to build stronger, more flood-resistant systems that better protect communities.
Supplemental spending increases federal borrowing and debt. This requires future tax revenue or spending cuts elsewhere in government.
Emergency spending may not be carefully monitored, risking fraud, waste, or misuse of funds. Money might not reach those most in need.
Repeated federal disaster funding might reduce incentives for states and individuals to prepare for natural disasters or invest in prevention.
States that experience different disasters might feel they receive unequal federal assistance. Funding decisions could appear politically motivated.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 9394
Civil Preparedness for Agroterrorism Exercise Act of 2026
HR 1342
Stopping Political Discrimination in Disaster Assistance Act
HR 10132
ARTICLE ONE Act
HR 10122
STORM FORTIFIED and Wildfire Prepared Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.