Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Originating chamber has voted to pass. Sent to the other chamber.
The House voted to pass the bill. It now moves to the Senate, which repeats the committee referral and floor-vote process.
Next: Passed Both Chambers
Conference committee (if versions differ), then the President
Authorizes exercises and training to prepare for potential terrorist attacks on U.S. agriculture.
The problem
The U.S. agricultural system faces potential security threats from terrorism. Agencies need coordinated exercises to test emergency response plans and identify gaps.
The proposal
The bill establishes a civil preparedness exercise program focused on agroterrorism scenarios. It requires federal agencies to conduct drills and training exercises to improve response capabilities.
The impact
Federal emergency management agencies, agricultural departments, and state/local officials gain new training requirements. Farmers and food supply industries benefit from improved emergency protocols.
Regular exercises help federal and state agencies identify weaknesses in emergency response systems. Coordinated training ensures agencies can work together effectively during actual crises.
Preparedness drills strengthen the nation's ability to respond quickly to agricultural threats. This protects food supplies and public health during emergencies.
Exercises bring together different government levels and agencies to practice joint response. This reduces confusion and improves communication during actual emergencies.
Running exercises costs money for staff, materials, and coordination. These expenses may not directly benefit taxpayers compared to other budget priorities.
Exercises simulate scenarios but cannot perfectly replicate actual crises. Lessons learned may not always transfer to unexpected situations.
State and local officials must participate in exercises alongside federal agencies. This diverts staff time and resources from regular duties.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 1342
Stopping Political Discrimination in Disaster Assistance Act
HR 10132
ARTICLE ONE Act
HR 10122
STORM FORTIFIED and Wildfire Prepared Act
SRES 844
A resolution honoring the lives and service of Emily Barker, Nicholas Hutcherson, Sydney Watson, Nathan Matthews, Nicholas Dale, and all those who serve on the front lines of wildland firefighting efforts in the United States.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.