Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Updates unemployment insurance system to better prepare for economic downturns.
The problem
Unemployment insurance systems may not be modern enough or prepared for serious recessions. States need stronger tools to help workers during economic crises.
The proposal
The bill modernizes unemployment insurance programs and builds readiness for recessions. It likely updates payment systems, eligibility rules, and emergency response procedures.
The impact
Unemployed workers, state governments, and employers would be affected. Changes could make benefits easier to access during job loss and recessions.
Modernized systems could deliver unemployment benefits faster and more reliably when recessions hit. Workers in financial crisis would get support more quickly.
States would have better tools and plans ready before economic problems start. This advance planning reduces confusion and delays during actual crises.
Modernizing outdated systems reduces fraud and payment errors. Better technology helps workers access benefits through smartphones and computers.
Quick unemployment payments help workers spend money and support local businesses. This keeps economies more stable during downturns.
Modernization and expanded systems require taxpayer funding. Critics worry about costs to federal and state budgets.
Funding unemployment insurance often comes from employer payroll taxes. Businesses might face higher taxes to pay for improvements.
Complex system changes are difficult for states to execute. Technical problems or delays could frustrate workers needing benefits.
Some argue easier benefits might discourage people from seeking jobs quickly. Others debate whether modernized systems properly balance help with work encouragement.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1607
Expressing support for the designation of September 2026 as "National Workforce Development Month".
HR 10703
Protecting Workers’ Benefits Act
S 5615
VEST Act
S 5646
Direct Seller and Real Estate Agent Harmonization Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.