Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, Armed Services, Veterans' Affairs, Oversight and Government Reform, and Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Expands behavioral health crisis services nationwide for mental health and substance abuse emergencies.
The problem
Americans face mental health and addiction crises with limited emergency services. Many communities lack rapid response teams and crisis alternatives to emergency rooms.
The proposal
Creates and expands behavioral health crisis response programs, mobile crisis teams, and alternatives to traditional emergency departments for mental health emergencies.
The impact
Mental health patients, people with addiction, emergency rooms, and crisis service providers benefit from expanded access to specialized behavioral health emergency response.
People experiencing mental health crises could access specialized teams trained in de-escalation rather than police. This may reduce hospital overcrowding and provide more appropriate care for behavioral emergencies.
Dedicated crisis response teams could handle some calls that currently overwhelm emergency departments. This frees up ERs to focus on medical emergencies.
Rapid access to crisis teams trained in mental health may prevent suicides and addiction-related deaths. Early intervention often improves outcomes.
Trained behavioral health professionals may handle situations better than police, reducing potential for harm or arrest of people in crisis.
Expanding crisis services nationwide requires significant federal funding. The bill's cost is unknown and could strain budgets or require tax increases.
Multiple committees oversee this bill, suggesting complex implementation across health, military, veterans, and education systems. Coordination gaps could slow rollout.
Creating enough trained crisis response teams nationwide will be difficult. Training quality and worker recruitment could be major obstacles.
The bill's financing mechanism is not specified. This raises questions about whether existing programs lose funding or new taxes are needed.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.