Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
A bill limiting government hiring preferences, likely for federal positions or military recruitment.
The problem
Concerns that current government hiring practices may use preferences that some believe are unfair or unnecessary for certain job categories.
The proposal
The bill would restrict or eliminate certain hiring preferences in federal government and military employment decisions.
The impact
Federal employees, military personnel, job applicants, and government agencies would face changes in hiring and recruitment practices.
Focusing on qualifications and abilities ensures the most capable people get hired. This could improve government efficiency and service quality.
Removing preferences creates equal consideration for all applicants. This may increase trust in hiring processes.
Simpler hiring rules could reduce administrative burden on agencies. This might speed up the hiring process.
Eliminating preferences may reduce hiring opportunities for historically underrepresented groups. This could slow progress toward diverse workforces.
Some preferences help military recruitment from specific communities or backgrounds. Removing them might limit recruitment options.
Without an official summary, it's unclear which specific preferences are affected. This uncertainty makes full assessment difficult.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.