Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Names a Fort Worth postal facility after Dionne Phillips Bagsby.
The problem
A postal facility in Fort Worth, Texas lacks an official name honoring a notable community member or historical figure.
The proposal
Designates the United States Postal Service facility at 4650 East Rosedale Street in Fort Worth, Texas as the 'Dionne Phillips Bagsby Post Office Building.'
The impact
The postal facility receives an official name. Fort Worth residents interact with a building honoring Dionne Phillips Bagsby. Minimal direct effects on most Americans.
Names the facility after someone the sponsoring members believe made meaningful contributions to Fort Worth. Recognizes local figures and their community service.
Renaming a building costs very little taxpayer money. It is a symbolic gesture that requires no major construction or infrastructure changes.
Local residents may feel valued when public buildings honor people from their area. Can strengthen community identity and connection to local institutions.
Congressional time spent on facility names could address other policy issues. This is one of many similar naming bills that use legislative resources.
Most Americans will never know about or visit this specific postal facility. The practical impact on public knowledge or community benefit is minimal.
The bill provides no summary or explanation of why Dionne Phillips Bagsby deserves this honor. Without public information, citizens cannot evaluate if the choice is appropriate.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.