Latest action: Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Hearings held.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires schools to have naloxone available to treat opioid overdoses.
The problem
Opioid overdoses are increasing among young people. Schools need tools to respond quickly when overdoses happen to save lives.
The proposal
The bill would require schools to stock naloxone (an overdose-reversal drug) and train staff to use it during emergencies.
The impact
Students, school staff, and communities benefit from faster overdose response. Schools face new requirements and costs for purchasing and training.
Naloxone can reverse opioid overdoses within minutes. Having it in schools means help is available immediately when students overdose, potentially preventing deaths.
Making naloxone available at schools treats overdose like any other medical emergency. This helps reduce shame and encourages students to seek help.
Schools are places where young people spend many hours. Quick access to naloxone at school means faster treatment than waiting for ambulances.
Trained staff can help any student who overdoses, whether from accidental exposure or intentional use. This protects everyone in the school community.
Schools must buy naloxone kits and pay for training programs. This creates new expenses for already tight school budgets without clear funding sources.
Schools may worry about legal responsibility if naloxone use goes wrong or if it's used incorrectly. Legal uncertainty could make schools hesitant to stock it.
Staff need proper training to use naloxone safely and confidently. Schools must dedicate time and resources to train multiple employees regularly.
While naloxone helps in emergencies, it doesn't address why opioid use happens in the first place. Treatment and prevention programs may be more important long-term solutions.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.