Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Originating chamber has voted to pass. Sent to the other chamber.
The House voted to pass the bill. It now moves to the Senate, which repeats the committee referral and floor-vote process.
Next: Passed Both Chambers
Conference committee (if versions differ), then the President
Prevents discrimination against organ transplant candidates based on disability status.
The problem
People with disabilities may face barriers or discrimination when seeking organ transplants due to their disability, not their medical ability to survive the procedure.
The proposal
Prohibits discrimination in organ transplant decisions based on disability. Requires medical criteria only for transplant eligibility decisions.
The impact
Organ transplant candidates with disabilities gain legal protection against being denied transplants because of their disability status alone.
People with disabilities deserve equal consideration for life-saving medical procedures. This bill ensures transplant decisions focus on medical factors, not disability stereotypes. It removes a barrier that could prevent qualified disabled patients from receiving needed organs.
The Americans with Disabilities Act already prohibits discrimination. This bill clarifies that organ transplant programs must follow these rules. It strengthens protections in an area where discrimination may currently occur.
More qualified candidates can receive organs if disability is not used as a rejection reason. This could improve outcomes for the organ transplant waiting list. Removing unfair barriers helps organs reach patients who need them most.
The bill pushes transplant centers to use clear, objective medical criteria for decisions. This reduces bias and makes the process more consistent across different hospitals.
Some argue that certain disabilities might complicate post-transplant care or recovery. However, medical professionals should evaluate these factors individually, not assume all disabled people cannot manage transplants.
Transplant centers may face confusion about what counts as illegal discrimination versus legitimate medical criteria. Training and compliance requirements could add costs to hospitals.
Hospitals might worry about legal liability if outcomes differ for disabled transplant recipients. This could lead to overly cautious practices that still restrict access indirectly.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.