Latest action: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Derek Schmidt (R-KS)
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Updates federal employment law chapters to fix outdated rules and correct technical mistakes.
The problem
Chapters 4, 10, and 131 of federal employment law contain outdated provisions and technical errors that need correction to keep the laws current and accurate.
The proposal
The bill amends three chapters of federal employment law to update provisions, correct errors, and ensure the rules accurately reflect current government operations and employment practices.
The impact
Federal employees, government agencies, and people applying for federal jobs are affected by clearer and more accurate employment rules and procedures.
Updates employment laws that no longer match how government actually works. Removes rules that refer to old systems or practices that have changed. Makes the law clearer for everyone to understand.
Fixes technical mistakes and confusing language in the current law. Removes contradictions that could cause problems for federal employees. Makes sure the law says what it actually means.
Clearer laws help government agencies apply rules the same way everywhere. Reduces confusion for federal employees about their rights and responsibilities. Makes it easier for people to understand how federal employment works.
The bill has no official summary provided, making it hard to know exactly what changes it makes. Without details, it's difficult to evaluate potential side effects or unintended consequences. Congress and the public cannot fully assess the bill's impact.
Technical corrections can sometimes have unexpected impacts on other laws or policies. Changes to employment law could affect how agencies enforce other rules. Any mistakes in the corrections could create new problems.
Without knowing the specific changes, stakeholders cannot properly comment or raise concerns. Federal employees and agencies couldn't weigh in on whether the updates make sense. The public cannot evaluate if the corrections are fair and reasonable.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.