Latest action: Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Public Lands, Forests, and Mining. Hearings held. With printed Hearing: S.Hrg. 119-237.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV)
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Bill addressing economic development and conservation in southern Nevada through land management and resource policies.
The problem
Southern Nevada faces competing needs for economic growth, resource management, and environmental protection on public lands requiring coordinated federal policy solutions.
The proposal
Legislation establishes framework for economic development initiatives and conservation measures on southern Nevada public lands, likely involving land designations or management changes.
The impact
Nevada residents, businesses, outdoor enthusiasts, and conservation groups are affected through changes to land use, development opportunities, and environmental protections in the region.
Bill may enable business development and job creation in southern Nevada by streamlining land access for economic projects. This could benefit local communities through increased employment and tax revenue.
Legislation addresses conservation needs alongside development, potentially protecting sensitive ecosystems while allowing responsible resource use. This balanced approach respects both preservation and economic needs.
Federal framework provides clear guidelines for land management across southern Nevada, reducing conflicts between state, local, and federal interests. Coordinated policy improves planning certainty.
Conservation measures may preserve outdoor recreation opportunities on public lands for hunting, fishing, and hiking. This protects quality of life for residents and supports tourism.
Conservation designations may limit future development on some lands, restricting economic opportunities for businesses and property owners. This could slow growth in affected areas.
If development provisions are too permissive, sensitive ecosystems could face degradation from mining, drilling, or construction. Ecological impacts may be difficult to reverse.
Federal land management limits state and local decision-making authority. Nevada communities may have less say in development affecting their region.
Without detailed summary, businesses, conservationists, and residents lack clarity on specific provisions affecting their interests. This ambiguity complicates planning and creates concerns.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1622
Expressing support for the preservation, protection, and maintenance of statues and monuments honoring Christopher Columbus as an enduring testament to the Nation's history, heritage, and identity.
HR 10669
LANDs Act
SRES 935
A resolution designating October 23, 2026, as "National Marine Sanctuary Day".
S 5608
Secure Rural Schools Reauthorization Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.