Latest action: Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Public Lands, Forests, and Mining. Hearings held. With printed Hearing: S.Hrg. 119-237.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Martin Heinrich (D-NM)
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Bill to protect and restore the Pecos Watershed through conservation and management efforts.
The problem
The Pecos Watershed faces environmental degradation from water use, erosion, and land management issues affecting water quality and ecosystem health.
The proposal
Establishes protections for the Pecos Watershed, likely directing agencies to coordinate conservation efforts, restore habitats, and manage water resources sustainably.
The impact
Affects landowners, water users, environmental groups, and local communities in the Pecos Watershed region across Texas and New Mexico.
Protects wildlife habitats and river ecosystems. Helps restore native species and natural water flows. Improves overall environmental health of the watershed.
Coordinated management can reduce pollution and erosion. Better water quality benefits downstream communities. Protects drinking water sources for residents.
Brings together stakeholders to solve shared water challenges. Encourages cooperation between states, tribes, and local groups. Provides framework for long-term planning.
Healthier watersheds attract outdoor activities and tourism. Creates economic opportunities for local communities. Increases property values in protected areas.
Property owners may face new land-use limits or requirements. Could reduce private land development opportunities. May require compliance with new regulations at cost.
Farmers and ranchers might face water-use restrictions or requirements. Could increase operational costs. May reduce water availability during droughts.
Requires federal funding for conservation and restoration projects. Taxpayers bear implementation costs. Budget uncertainty for long-term commitment.
Monitoring compliance across large watershed area is difficult. May require new agency staff and resources. Could face legal challenges from affected parties.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1622
Expressing support for the preservation, protection, and maintenance of statues and monuments honoring Christopher Columbus as an enduring testament to the Nation's history, heritage, and identity.
HR 10669
LANDs Act
SRES 935
A resolution designating October 23, 2026, as "National Marine Sanctuary Day".
S 5608
Secure Rural Schools Reauthorization Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.