Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill transfers land in Pennington County to a new owner or manager.
The problem
Pennington County has land that the federal government currently controls or manages, and there is a need to transfer ownership or management to another party.
The proposal
The bill conveys specified federal land in Pennington County to a designated recipient, changing who owns or manages that property.
The impact
Local governments, landowners, and residents in Pennington County are affected by changes in land ownership and management responsibilities.
Transferring land to local authorities may allow Pennington County residents to make decisions about their own land. Local leaders often understand community needs better than distant federal agencies.
New ownership could enable development, resource extraction, or land use that generates tax revenue or jobs locally. Communities may benefit from increased economic activity.
Transferring land removes federal management costs and responsibilities. This could reduce government spending on administration and upkeep.
Local ownership may speed up decisions about land use compared to federal bureaucratic processes. Communities could act faster on their priorities.
Federal lands often receive protections for wildlife, forests, and natural resources. Transferring land could remove these safeguards if the new owner has different priorities.
Federal lands typically remain open to the public for recreation and use. Private owners might restrict access, limiting where people can hunt, fish, or hike.
Local governments may lack resources to properly maintain or manage the land. This could create unexpected costs for counties or cities.
Without an official summary, the bill's specific details are unclear. Citizens cannot easily understand exactly what land is involved or who receives it.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1622
Expressing support for the preservation, protection, and maintenance of statues and monuments honoring Christopher Columbus as an enduring testament to the Nation's history, heritage, and identity.
HR 10669
LANDs Act
SRES 935
A resolution designating October 23, 2026, as "National Marine Sanctuary Day".
S 5608
Secure Rural Schools Reauthorization Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.