Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Limits how much patients pay for certain procedures at ambulatory surgical centers under Medicare.
The problem
Medicare patients may pay high coinsurance amounts for services at ambulatory surgical centers, creating financial barriers to needed care.
The proposal
Amends Medicare law to cap coinsurance charges for specific services provided at ambulatory surgical centers.
The impact
Medicare patients receive lower out-of-pocket costs; healthcare facilities may see reduced revenue; taxpayers may fund increased Medicare spending.
Patients undergoing procedures at ambulatory surgical centers would pay less out-of-pocket. This makes healthcare more affordable for seniors and people on fixed incomes. Lower costs help people access necessary medical care.
When patients face lower copayments, more people may seek needed procedures. This can improve overall public health by removing financial barriers to care.
Medicare beneficiaries are often seniors with limited incomes. Capping coinsurance protects this vulnerable group from unexpected large medical bills that could cause financial hardship.
Lower patient coinsurance means Medicare pays more for the same services. This increases federal spending, potentially raising taxpayer costs or requiring cuts elsewhere.
Ambulatory surgical centers lose income from coinsurance fees. This could force them to cut services, reduce staff, or limit availability of procedures.
Limiting coinsurance only for certain services at certain facilities could encourage overuse or shift procedures away from other settings. This may reduce efficiency in the healthcare system.
The bill title doesn't specify which services get price caps or the exact coinsurance limits. This vagueness makes it hard to predict full financial impacts.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.