Latest action: Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 682.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Speaker of the House schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Protects students' rights to form and join campus clubs and organizations without government interference.
The problem
Students may face restrictions on creating or joining campus organizations based on ideology, beliefs, or viewpoints. Universities may limit student association freedoms through policies or administrative decisions.
The proposal
Prevents colleges from denying students the right to form groups, requires equal treatment of student organizations, and protects students from discrimination based on their views or beliefs.
The impact
College students gain stronger legal protections for joining clubs. Universities face new requirements for how they approve organizations. Student life and campus policies may change significantly.
Students gain stronger legal protections to form clubs and organizations based on their beliefs. This supports free speech and freedom of association on campuses. Students cannot be punished for their viewpoints.
Universities must treat all student organizations fairly regardless of their ideology or beliefs. This prevents selective enforcement of rules against certain groups. Creates clearer, more consistent standards for all clubs.
Students cannot be denied membership in clubs because of their personal beliefs or views. Protects minority viewpoints from being excluded on campus. Encourages diverse perspectives in student organizations.
Colleges must establish transparent rules for approving student organizations. Removes vague or subjective decision-making. Students know what to expect when forming groups.
Universities may lose ability to prevent groups that promote violence or illegal activity. Colleges might struggle to enforce conduct standards. Campus safety policies could become weaker.
Colleges face more lawsuits if they restrict student organizations. Legal costs and administrative burden on universities increase. Schools may need more compliance staff.
Student organizations that harass or discriminate against others could claim protection. Hate groups or extremist clubs could use this law to operate. Other students' rights to feel safe may conflict.
Unclear how universities enforce other rules while protecting association rights. May create conflicts between student safety and freedom of association. Hard to define what rules still apply.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.