Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires extra pay for health care workers during public health emergencies.
The problem
Health care workers face danger during disease outbreaks and emergencies without extra compensation for the increased risks they take.
The proposal
Establishes hazard pay requirements for health care workers during declared public health emergencies or disasters.
The impact
Health care workers would receive additional pay during emergencies. Employers and government budgets would face higher costs.
Health care workers face serious dangers during emergencies like pandemics. Extra pay acknowledges these risks and shows appreciation for their sacrifice.
Better pay during crises could keep experienced workers on the job instead of quitting. This helps maintain staffing levels when hospitals need them most.
Hazard pay could attract more people to health care jobs or encourage volunteers during emergencies. This expands the workforce available during crises.
Workers in other dangerous jobs like military and firefighting receive hazard pay. Health care workers deserve the same recognition for similar risks.
Paying extra during emergencies costs hospitals and government more money. This could strain budgets already stretched thin during crises.
Higher labor costs might force hospitals to hire fewer workers or cut other programs. This could hurt overall health care capacity.
It's unclear what counts as an emergency worthy of hazard pay. Disagreements over when pay kicks in could create conflicts.
Non-health workers facing dangers might feel left out. The policy could create resentment between different job types.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.