Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Provides extra pay for healthcare workers during public health emergencies.
The problem
Healthcare workers face dangerous conditions during health crises without additional compensation for their extra risk and effort.
The proposal
Establishes hazard pay requirements for healthcare workers during declared public health emergencies.
The impact
Healthcare workers receive extra pay during emergencies. Healthcare employers face increased labor costs. Patients may see higher medical bills.
Healthcare workers risk their health helping patients during emergencies. Extra pay acknowledges their sacrifice and dangerous work. This shows appreciation for their essential service.
Hazard pay could encourage healthcare workers to stay employed during crises. This keeps experienced staff available when hospitals need them most.
The bill highlights that healthcare workers do critical jobs society depends on. Hazard pay formalizes that these jobs deserve special recognition during emergencies.
Extra pay during emergencies could attract people to healthcare careers. This could help address shortages in nursing and other medical fields.
Paying hazard pay raises hospitals' labor expenses. These higher costs could be passed to patients through increased medical bills and insurance premiums.
Smaller hospitals and rural clinics have tighter budgets than large medical centers. They may struggle to afford hazard pay requirements.
The bill may not clearly define what counts as a public health emergency. Disagreements could arise about when hazard pay applies.
The bill may place new federal requirements on states and hospitals. This could conflict with how states prefer to manage their own healthcare systems.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.