Latest action: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 108.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Brian Schatz (D-HI)
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Limits social media access for minors to protect children from harmful content and addiction.
The problem
Children spend excessive time on social media platforms, which may cause mental health issues, sleep problems, and addiction. Parents and lawmakers worry about age-appropriate content exposure.
The proposal
The bill would restrict minors' ability to access social media platforms, likely through age verification requirements or usage limits on platforms targeting or popular with children.
The impact
Social media companies must change how children access their platforms. Parents gain tools to manage children's online time. Young users face restrictions on social media use.
Limiting social media access may reduce anxiety, depression, and low self-esteem in children. Research suggests excessive social media use correlates with mental health problems in teens.
Social media platforms use addictive design features targeting young users. Restrictions could decrease problematic usage patterns and help children develop healthier habits.
The bill empowers parents to limit their children's screen time and exposure to inappropriate content. This gives families better tools to manage online safety.
Restricting minor access may reduce how much personal data platforms collect from children. This limits targeted advertising and data misuse affecting young users.
Age restrictions on platforms may limit minors' ability to express themselves and access information online. This raises constitutional questions about free speech rights for young people.
Age verification is difficult to implement reliably without privacy invasions. Young people could easily use fake information or workarounds to access platforms anyway.
Social media companies rely on young users for growth and advertising revenue. Restrictions could hurt platform profitability and reduce innovation in the industry.
Restrictions may prevent low-income youth from accessing online educational resources and social connection. This could increase inequality in digital access and opportunity.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10671
Securing Our Critical Infrastructure Act
HR 10695
United States Submarine Cable Security Policy Act of 2026
HR 7022
Mystic Alerts Act
S 5668
Methane Monitoring Science Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.