Latest action: The title of the measure was amended. Agreed to without objection.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Nicholas Begich (R-AK)
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Clarifies how the Migratory Bird Treaty Act applies to Native American tribes and their lands.
The problem
Uncertainty exists about how federal migratory bird protection laws apply to tribal nations and their reservation lands, creating legal confusion.
The proposal
The bill clarifies the Migratory Bird Treaty Act's application to Native American tribes, their territories, and their hunting rights regarding protected bird species.
The impact
Native American tribes, federal agencies, and environmental groups are affected by how bird protection rules apply on tribal lands and to tribal hunting practices.
Provides Native American tribes with clearer legal guidance on managing their own resources. This helps tribes exercise self-governance rights on their lands without federal confusion.
Clarifying the law reduces disputes between tribes and federal agencies over bird protection. Clearer rules help everyone understand their obligations and rights.
May protect tribal hunting traditions and cultural practices involving migratory birds. Clarity allows tribes to maintain traditional practices within legal frameworks.
Clear rules make it easier for agencies to enforce bird protection laws consistently. Everyone understands what is permitted and prohibited.
If the bill reduces protections for migratory birds, bird populations could decline. Some bird species migrate across states and need consistent protection.
Clarifying tribal authority creates new administrative work for agencies and tribes. Coordinating between multiple tribes and federal agencies takes time and resources.
Without careful wording, the bill could create exceptions that weaken bird protections overall. Environmental groups worry protections might be reduced.
If tribal protections differ from state rules, migratory birds moving across borders could face inconsistent treatment. This creates coordination challenges.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.