Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Promotes job creation through evidence-based workforce policies and innovation programs.
The problem
Job market gaps exist between skills employers need and worker preparation. Evidence-based job policies could improve hiring and economic opportunity.
The proposal
Establishes programs using data and research to improve job training, employer partnerships, and workforce development initiatives across federal agencies.
The impact
Workers gain better training. Employers find skilled workers. Federal workforce programs become more effective and coordinated.
Using evidence and research to design job training programs helps match what workers learn with what employers actually need. This reduces training waste and improves employment success rates.
Evidence-based approaches encourage employers to work with training programs. This creates real-world skills learning and better job placement for graduates.
Using research and data helps agencies spend workforce funding on programs that actually work, rather than guessing. This reduces waste in federal job programs.
Better-prepared workers and informed employers create more successful hiring matches. This potentially increases employment rates and worker retention.
Creating new evidence-based programs requires research, data systems, and program design. Initial federal spending may be substantial before seeing results.
Building evidence takes time through research and testing. Job seekers needing immediate help may not benefit quickly from new programs.
Without detailed bill language available, it is unclear how programs will work, who manages them, and how success gets measured across agencies.
National evidence-based programs might not work equally well in all regions with different job markets and worker populations.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.