Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Protects water utilities from cyberattacks by requiring security standards.
The problem
Water systems are vulnerable to digital attacks that could disrupt service or contaminate supplies. No consistent security requirements exist across utilities.
The proposal
Establishes cybersecurity standards, reporting requirements, and protections for water authorities. Creates guidelines utilities must follow to prevent hacking and data breaches.
The impact
Water utilities must invest in security. Consumers may see rate increases. Communities get better protection against water system disruptions.
Securing water systems prevents attackers from tampering with water quality or interrupting service to communities. This keeps drinking water safe and reliable for millions of Americans.
Establishes consistent cybersecurity rules across all water utilities. This gives utilities clear guidance on what security measures they must implement.
As cyberattacks grow more common, water systems need defenses. This bill helps infrastructure stay ahead of emerging digital threats.
Water disruptions cost communities millions. Strong cybersecurity prevents expensive outages and the emergency costs of recovering from attacks.
Water systems must spend money on new security technology and staff training. Small rural utilities may struggle with these expenses more than large urban systems.
Utilities often pass costs to customers through higher water bills. Low-income families could face affordability challenges as rates increase.
Without seeing the full bill text, standards might be unclear or difficult to follow. Utilities could disagree about what the law requires.
Reporting requirements and inspections add administrative work for utilities. Smaller systems have limited staff to handle extra paperwork.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10671
Securing Our Critical Infrastructure Act
HR 10695
United States Submarine Cable Security Policy Act of 2026
HR 7022
Mystic Alerts Act
S 5668
Methane Monitoring Science Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.