Latest action: Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 25 - 15.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Speaker of the House schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Bill to require upfront disclosure of health care prices to patients before treatment.
The problem
Patients often don't know how much medical procedures cost before receiving care, making it difficult to compare prices or plan financially.
The proposal
Requires health care providers and insurers to give patients clear price information upfront so they can see costs before getting treatment or services.
The impact
Patients gain price clarity before medical procedures. Hospitals and insurers must create new price disclosure systems. Competition based on pricing may increase.
Patients can compare prices between providers and make informed decisions. This transparency helps people find affordable care and avoid surprise bills. Better information supports consumer decision-making.
Price competition increases when patients see costs. Providers may lower prices to attract patients. Market competition can drive down overall health care spending.
Upfront pricing prevents unexpected medical debt. Patients can plan budgets and avoid financial hardship from surprise bills. Better financial predictability for families.
Public price information creates fairer competition. Providers cannot hide expensive services. Transparency benefits honest, competitively-priced providers.
Hospitals and insurers must build new systems to track and display prices. Administrative costs are significant. Small providers may struggle more than large ones.
Some procedures have unpredictable costs or complications. Upfront pricing may be inaccurate for complex cases. Final bills may differ from initial quotes.
Patients seeing high prices might skip necessary treatment. Delayed care can worsen health conditions. Vulnerable populations may avoid critical procedures.
Smaller medical practices face high costs to comply. Enforcement mechanisms may be burdensome. Providers may pass costs to patients or reduce services.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.