Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs.
Originating chamber has voted to pass. Sent to the other chamber.
The House voted to pass the bill. It now moves to the Senate, which repeats the committee referral and floor-vote process.
Next: Passed Both Chambers
Conference committee (if versions differ), then the President
Allows San Manuel Nation to exchange tribal land with the federal government.
The problem
San Manuel Nation needs to adjust its land holdings for tribal purposes. A land exchange with the federal government could help the tribe better use its territory.
The proposal
The bill authorizes San Manuel Nation to trade some of its current lands with the U.S. federal government for different federal lands of equal value.
The impact
San Manuel Nation gains more useful territory. Federal land management changes in affected areas. The exchange requires both parties to agree the lands are equally valuable.
San Manuel Nation can get lands better suited for their needs. The tribe could use new territory for housing, business, or cultural purposes. This helps the nation develop economically.
The bill respects tribal sovereignty by letting San Manuel Nation control its own land. Tribes managing their own property is an important part of Native American self-governance.
Land swaps can help the federal government manage public lands more effectively. Trading lower-value federal land for tribal land may improve overall resource management.
The federal government gives up public land that could be used for national parks, forests, or other public purposes. Citizens lose access to that federal territory.
The bill summary is very brief and doesn't explain which specific lands are involved. Without more detail, it's hard to evaluate if the exchange is fair and beneficial.
Different land management practices between tribal and federal handlers could affect ecosystems. The bill doesn't mention environmental protections for the exchanged lands.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.