Latest action: Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 660.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Speaker of the House schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Establishes federal education standards to address antisemitism in schools.
The problem
Schools may lack consistent policies addressing antisemitism and related discrimination against Jewish students and communities.
The proposal
The bill creates federal guidelines and requirements for schools to prevent and respond to antisemitic incidents and education.
The impact
Public schools, students, administrators, and teachers must implement new antisemitism policies and training programs.
Provides consistent federal standards to help schools identify and stop antisemitic harassment and discrimination. Creates accountability for addressing incidents that hurt Jewish students.
Gives schools specific rules about what counts as antisemitism and how to handle it. Helps educators and administrators respond uniformly to problems.
Requires education about antisemitism so students and staff understand the problem better. Builds understanding of Jewish history and cultures across schools.
Federal standards help clarify what behavior is unacceptable and protects schools from legal confusion about handling incidents.
Schools must spend money on new training programs, policies, and staff time to comply with federal requirements. Smaller districts may struggle with expenses.
Federal mandates reduce local school control over curriculum and policies. Communities may disagree with one-size-fits-all rules from Washington.
Different groups disagree on what counts as antisemitism, especially regarding criticism of Israel. Vague definitions could lead to confusion or unfair punishment.
Focuses only on antisemitism but doesn't address discrimination against other religious or ethnic groups equally, raising fairness questions.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.