Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Improves Medicare patient access to radiology services and imaging care.
The problem
Medicare patients may face delays or barriers in accessing necessary radiology and imaging services from qualified providers.
The proposal
The bill modifies Medicare rules to expand access to radiology care, likely removing restrictions on which providers can offer imaging services.
The impact
Medicare patients gain easier access to imaging services. Radiologists and imaging providers face new rules. Healthcare costs for imaging services may change.
Patients may get imaging tests faster without long waits. More providers could offer these services in their communities. People get answers quicker about their health.
Allowing more providers to offer imaging services could increase competition. Competition may lower prices for patients and insurance plans. Better service could result from providers competing for patients.
People in rural areas may gain better access to imaging services. Expanding provider options helps regions with few specialists. Remote patients need not travel as far for care.
More providers offering services could mean varying quality levels. Some providers may lack proper training or equipment. Patient safety depends on maintaining high standards.
Medicare costs could rise if more imaging services are used. Increased access might lead to unnecessary tests. Overall healthcare spending for seniors could increase.
Radiologists might face lost income from new competition. Existing imaging centers could lose business to new providers. Jobs in traditional radiology departments may be affected.
More providers means more monitoring is needed. Government may struggle to ensure quality standards are met. Enforcement could be difficult and costly.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.