Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Coordinates federal wildfire response efforts between agencies.
The problem
Wildfires are growing larger and more dangerous. Multiple federal agencies respond separately, sometimes without good communication or coordination.
The proposal
The bill establishes better coordination systems between federal agencies that fight wildfires and manage public lands during fire emergencies.
The impact
Federal agencies, firefighters, and communities affected by wildfires will experience improved emergency response coordination and potentially faster assistance.
Better coordination between agencies means faster information sharing and quicker deployment of firefighting resources. Communities in danger could receive help sooner.
When agencies work together instead of duplicating efforts, taxpayers spend less on wildfire response. Resources go further and waste decreases.
Clear coordination reduces confusion and miscommunication that put firefighters at risk. Better planning means safer operations on the ground.
Unified response strategies protect more people and property from wildfire damage. Coordinated evacuation and resource allocation work more effectively.
More coordination sometimes means more meetings and approvals needed. This could delay response in fast-moving fire situations where quick action matters most.
The bill may require new spending to create coordination systems, but the cost is not specified. Taxpayers don't know the price tag.
Without an official summary, it's hard to know exactly what coordination methods the bill requires. Implementation could vary widely.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10671
Securing Our Critical Infrastructure Act
HR 10695
United States Submarine Cable Security Policy Act of 2026
HR 7022
Mystic Alerts Act
S 5668
Methane Monitoring Science Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.